Do You Support Adding Street Trees to the 800 Block of Princeton Place, NW?

As anyone who has lived in Park View for a while knows, we have a lot of hot, treeless streets due to a lack of planning when the neighborhood was originally building out. I have had numerous conversations over the years with neighbors who would like to see more trees, and have worked to get more spaces for street trees where ever I find an opportunity.

While out walking last week, it dawned on me that an ideal place to add more trees could be the 800 block of Princeton Place, NW. While it is a short street with only two rowhouses on it, I think every treebox we can create improves the entire neighborhood.

The 800 block of Princeton Place has conditions favorable for adding trees in public space.

What makes the 800 block of Princeton Place promising for adding tree box bump outs is its width and configuration. Currently, it is designated as a one-way street (east bound). It also currently does not allow parking on either the north or south side of the street (although I have seen people park on the south side on more than one occasion). The street is also just over 35 feet wide, meaning that is is over built for the two lanes of traffic it allows.

Measurment in ArcGIS indicates that Princeton Place is 35 feet wide, more than enough for two lanes of traffic and tree box bump outs.

An onsite visit to the street along with reviewing maps indicates that there may be utility infrastructure on the south side of the street, so that leaves the north side open to potential reconfiguration — which is actually better as southbound New Hampshire buses turn onto Princeton Place to travel north on Georgia Avenue.

Below is a rough outline of where curb bump outs could occur on the north side of the street. Depending upon tree selection and planting location, this should create room for 4 to 6 new trees.

Bump outs on Princeton Place could create room for 4-6 new trees, depending upon tree selection and planting location.

While cost is always a factor, when I mentioned this opportunity to some folks at DDOT during a recent meeting, there was some excitement about this. Narrowing the street would improve vehicular safety, narrowing the crossway at Georgia would improve pedestrian safety, and the new trees would increase the overall tree canopy — all DDOT goals.

So what are your thoughts, shall we make this a priority in 2020?

 

Explore posts in the same categories: DDOT, Streets and Trees

Tags: , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

4 Comments on “Do You Support Adding Street Trees to the 800 Block of Princeton Place, NW?”

  1. Thomas on Park Says:

    Kent: I love this idea. Hey, what if we put a contraflow protected bike lane on Rock Creek Church from Warder to Georgia? It would slow traffic, improve bike connectivity, and cost 0 parking.

  2. treehugger Says:

    this is a really great idea.

  3. Aaron_on_Luray Says:

    This is a great idea, but might I suggest putting the tree boxes on the south side of the street so that as the trees grow they maximize their shading of the street and not the buildings to the north? Would assume that with big tree boxes like that large trees (Oaks, etc.) could be prioritized to really have a big impact. I’ve seen too many small trees planted in tree boxes that won’t have any substantial impact on the heat issues you mention. My 2 cents 🙂

    • S. Davis Says:

      This is a great point from Aaron. At peak of summer sun gets close to straight overhead, but most of the year’s it’s at an angle from the south. Prioritize getting the shade landing on at least one of the sidewalks! 35 feet is crazy wide even for two lanes in a city where 11-foot lanes are plenty wide for neighborhood streets.


Leave a Reply to Aaron_on_Luray Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: