Park Morton Redevelopment Effort Clears Significant Hurdle, Receives Council Approval

bruce-monroe-site(Rendering of the Bruce Monroe site from the southeast showing park and building locations as proposed in Zoning Case 16-11.)

Yesterday, the Council of the District of Columbia voted unanimously at their Committee of the Whole meeting (watch meeting) to place the Bruce Monroe surplus and disposition resolutions on the consent agenda for their final Legislative Meeting of 2016, at which they were approved later in the day. Prior to the vote, Councilmembers Nadeau, Grosso, Bonds, and May each spoke about the importance of the project and stated their support.

Particularly noteworthy were the comments from Councilmembers Grosso and May. Councilmember Grosso acknowledged having received many emails and calls both supporting and opposing the plan to use the Bruce Monroe site as part of the Park Morton development, but stated strongly that he would be supporting the effort that would allow the District to fulfill its promise to the Park Morton residents. He also noted on a personal level that he grew up in the neighborhood and in his youth the site resembled a jail in the middle of the community with a fence around it, and not a park. Councilmember May, for her part, stated that while she rarely spoke on issues located outside her ward she would be voting in support. She also stated that she was familiar with the needs of the Park Morton residents and that whether in Ward 8 or any other Ward of the city all residents deserve quality housing and a safe place to live.

The Council’s  approval of both the Bruce Monroe surplus and disposition resolutions supports the effort for the site to be used as the “Build First” site in the District’s effort to replace the Park Morton Housing Complex with a new mixed-income community without displacing Park Morton families from the community. The Zoning Commission is scheduled to take action on the related Park Morton Planned Unit Development cases on January 30, 2017, following two hearings held earlier this month (brief overview of zoning hearings here).

Prior to the Council action, Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1A voted in early 2016 to support the surplus and disposition of the Bruce Monroe site for the Park Morton effort with the condition that the District include a large, permanent park as part of the redevelopment effort. The District Government has recognized this condition and 1.02 acres of the site will be redeveloped as a permanent park with programming to be determined with input from the community. A 6,700 sq. ft. central green is also planned for Morton Street as part of the redevelopment project. Advisory Neighborhood Commission 1A will also continue to explore opportunities to improve, create, and expand public access to park spaces in the Columbia Heights, Park View, and Pleasant Plains neighborhoods as it considers future development and engages in the Comprehensive Plan amendment process.

In addition to preserving 147 public housing units and establishing new permanent park spaces, the Park Morton redevelopment effort will increase area housing for seniors and families at all income levels. The project will also have a significant and long-lasting positive impact on lower Georgia Avenue. In addition to increasing area housing options, it will also improve public safety and encourage development along the corridor. By aligning new roads and reknitting the development on Morton Street into the surrounding community, blind alleys and the Morton Street cul-de-sac will be removed – a configuration that is not conducive to public safety. And by removing the uncertainty on whether the redevelopment of Park Morton will move forward, the District will encourage developers who own property on Georgia Avenue to move forward with their respective projects.

Explore posts in the same categories: Development, Housing, Parks and Green spaces

Tags: , , , , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

5 Comments on “Park Morton Redevelopment Effort Clears Significant Hurdle, Receives Council Approval”

  1. Curious George Says:

    Kent, it’s a little disingenuous to say this place is creating “new permanent park spaces” when it is TAKING AWAY a significant part of an existing park space. This is undeniably a net loss of park space in an area of town that is desperately lacking in parks.

    • Chuck Says:

      Banneker Rec is 1/3 of a mile south. The existing park was never supposed to be permanent. It is disingenuous to claim otherwise.

  2. Angry Parakeet Says:

    That area is so dense already. Have you seen how full the 70 and 79 busses are? It takes significant stopping time to board/disembark. And all the parking in the area is already gone. Every bit of curb space is taken, the police now even allow parking in the alley itself because there are not enough spaces; and here come 300 units with parking for 129? I luckily have my own space but what can be the outcome with this overcrowding of streets and busses?

  3. Jim Slicio Says:

    Waiting for this project to fail. The areas infrastructure can’t handle this amount of change.

    Our community will get a ““new permanent park” that fails to replace in kind even the crappy amenities DC installed temporarily.

    Council members get your bank accounts ready: Dantes Partners are going to have some extra money to spread around after this goes through.

  4. Derek Says:

    Thanks Kent for keeping of us informed of this important community development. Whether you like the project or not (and I think it’s great), it will undoubtedly change Parkview, and we should all appreciate you keeping us up to date on how it progresses.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: