Brief Notes from DDOT’s North-South Corridor Study Public Meeting

This de

This map from the presentation indicates ridership volume and most heavily used stops.

After attending last night’s North-South Corridor Study at Banneker Recreation Center, I wanted to share a few notes and first impressions while they are still fresh in my mind. If you didn’t attend, but want to, there is a final meeting tonight at Emery Recreation Center – 5701 Georgia Ave NW – from 3:30pm-8:00pm. Presentations will be at 4:00pm and 7:00pm.

The current round of meetings are the second of three rounds, with the final series currently planned for around June. The first round was in November and was very general in its approach. It focused on streetcars and buses, along with a variety of corridors.

The stated purpose of the corridor study is to evaluate reliable and comprehensive improved transit service in the North-South corridor and support existing neighborhoods and future growth in and along the corridor. The corridor in question is the 9-mile corridor from Takoma/Silver Spring to Buzzard Point/Southwest.

Since the first meetings, and with the above in mind, a few decisions have been made (although there are still many more that need to be made). First off, it definitely looks like DDOT has settled on streetcars as the mode of transportation. Based on the data of ridership in the corridors now and the population projects in the coming years, the streetcar option provides the better scenario for capacity and reliability.

In short, to use DDOT’s words, they are choosing the streetcar option because they:

  1. Increase transit capacity,
  2. Provide complementary service to buses,
  3. Improve transit vehicle accessibility and reliability of service,
  4. Increase transit share of trips, and
  5. Provide a higher quality of service.

There were a couple of things I found interesting in looking at the various information boards. The first was a map showing ridership volume and busiest stops (see map above). In looking at 16th and 14th streets vs. Georgia Avenue, 16th and 14th streets have a ridership that suggests that they support more commuters and the Georgia Avenue data suggested more local traffic. This ridership pattern suggested that the future streetcar route should be on or near Georgia Avenue.

Some streetcar routes still being considered.

Some streetcar routes still being considered.

Other routes were discounted because they were considered to have fatal flaws (constructability, grades, turns, & tunnels/bridges) . 14th Street, for example, already has a horrible traffic intersection at the intersection of Monroe and 13th Street has a grade by Cardozo High School that is too steep for a good streetcar line.

North of New Hampshire Avenue, Georgia Avenue is definitely the route with only the end in question (Takoma or Silver Spring). In our area (Zone 3) both Georgia Avenue and Sherman Avenue are on the table. Due to the new streetscape along Sherman, and the higher volume of traffic on Georgia, I favor Georgia over Sherman.

Roughly at Florida Avenue, four different possible routes come in to play. Of these, I think the 14th Street option is the best, followed by the 11th Street option. Either would bring much needed transit to an area not well served by Metrorail. I favor the 14th Street option more because it would serve more of U Street and I think that is important.

Lastly, parking and traffic configurations still need to be figured out. There were several boards that illustrated possible traffic patterns with a streetcar system in place. Some of these included parking, others did not. None were being presented as what DDOT will be doing, but rather as options to get attendees talking about what they liked or didn’t like. As for me, I think there is definitely room for both streetcars and parking south of Florida Avenue and north of New Hampshire Avenue. I’m still uncertain about the Florida to New Hampshire section of Georgia Avenue.  I know parking is an issue with some, but I also know that increased transit capacity is critical with a growing city and new residential developments continuing to come to Georgia.

I’ll post the slide deck from the meetings once it is publicly available.
street configurations north south study(Two of the many street configuration patterns posted at the meeting for attendees to evaluate)

Explore posts in the same categories: DDOT, Streetcars, traffic

Tags: , ,

You can comment below, or link to this permanent URL from your own site.

6 Comments on “Brief Notes from DDOT’s North-South Corridor Study Public Meeting”

  1. mbk Says:

    thanks for the summary Kent. I would support a dedicated streetcar lane over parking. I just dont think that many businesses on GA avenue actually rely on on street parking to survive as the number of spaces is very limited. Concerns about spillover parking into residential areas can be alleviated through different parking restrictions, especially in the evenings. A dedicated lane would make this more on par with metro in terns of efficiency. I hope Park View folks will come out in support of streetcar on GA avenue!

  2. Lisa G. Says:

    Thanks for the thorough summary Kent!

  3. Keefer Place Says:

    Kent, I was also at the meeting, but still appreciate your summary.
    I find it unfortunate that the planning team is still considering Sherman Avenue in Zone 3. It actually seems a very unrealistic option and is really a distraction. Sherman would not allow for dedicated lanes because of the size of the street, doesn’t have the population density / ridership of Georgia, wouldn’t allow for the same level of economic development, and is residential. And more to the point of being residential, I can’t imagine that people living on Sherman would want a streetcar and stops in front of their houses at 2 AM on Friday and Saturday nights . This wouldn’t be an issue on Georgia, and I really don’t think that we should invest in a streetcar in a corridor that may not support its full use, especially since this isn’t a problem one block away.

    I am also a bit disappointed that there are not more creative options for dedicated lanes and parking.

    A few options I did not see:

    Dedicated lanes with parking on one side of the street and not the other.
    Dedicated lanes with one lane of traffic in each direction with rush hour parking restrictions that allow for two lanes of traffic headed south in the morning and two lanes of traffic headed north in the evening.
    Dedicated lanes with parking on both sides and only two lanes of traffic.

    • Aaron_on_Luray Says:

      +1 Keefer Place. I agree totally that for this section, Georgia Ave. is by far the better option of the two. Not only is it a larger street (easier to have dedicated lanes) it will also service all of the new businesses that have come/are coming to the corridor.

      From my experience, the parking on Georgia does not contribute very much to business traffic. Most customers are either walking or biking from the adjacent neighborhoods. I think getting rid of parking all together would work great, still leaving 2 north/south car travel lanes while providing efficient, rapid, and reliable transit. From the tests on H st. I can just see shared lanes being a mess with traffic, making the streetcar no better than a bus.

      If parking is a concern, I think your recommendation of having “Dedicated lanes with one lane of traffic in each direction with rush hour parking restrictions” would be a great compromise.

      Kent, is there anyway we can suggest alternative street configurations for DDOT to use at future meetings/conversations with people?

  4. Keefer Pl Says:

    +1 for Georgia Ave. Keeping my fingers crossed!

  5. […] their February public North-South Streetcar meetings to their online library. As a follow up to my previous post, I wanted to make sure residents interested in this initiative were aware of these materials and […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: